SAE-1.5 · what-if research workbench

Change a condition. See the moment and the journey.

Explore the same hypothetical model two ways: a baseline with no intervention and a what-if that changes conditions at a chosen step. The chart shows instantaneous modeled accessibility, while the cumulative total measures accumulated obstruction over the interval—not cumulative consciousness.

Model simulation, not a personal score. Inputs, coefficients and the proposed developmental role of Belief are illustrative and unvalidated. These are not probabilities, neural measures, measures of the Divine, or recommendations about anyone's spiritual condition. No data is stored or sent.

Skill is high. Recognition becomes a new opportunity for attachment; an integrity lapse need not erase skill.

Recognition raises exposure and attachment pressure; it does not prove corruption.

0.000.250.500.751.000481216Hypothetical time step (not a day or a lifetime)
━━ Baseline Awareness (dashed)━━ What-if Awareness━━ What-if obstruction

Baseline A(t)

0.635

What-if A(t)

0.465

What-if K(t)

0.535

Signed P × S

0.572

Cumulative journey, steps 0–16

Baseline obstruction exposure

5.873 model-step units

What-if obstruction exposure

7.684 model-step units

These totals are numerical areas under the K(t) curves, not lifetime karma, spiritual merit, or cumulative Awareness. The output A(t) is recalculated at each step; it is not integrated as a spiritual quantity.

What the simulator actually calculates

A(t)=C × [1−K_effective(t)], with C=1. A momentary event activates e=L×T; q=P_effective×S_effective changes the candidate remaining obstruction R, and K_effective=K_base+(1−K_base)R.

Between moments, dK_base/dt=u(1−K_base)−vK_base, u=αM+γD max(−q,0), v=βD max(q,0)+H, H≥0. H represents effective support rather than simply help being offered. The code uses the exact constant-rate step update, keeping K in [0,1]. Belief has no instantaneous multiplier. A developmental Belief-to-cultivated-P pathway remains to be defined and tested.

Independent recovery pathway: When q≤0 and D=0, a positive effective support rate H can allow K_base to decrease, but only if its clearing effect outweighs ongoing reinforcement. These hypothetical scenarios do not predict treatment outcomes.

Boundaries: Only K_base develops endogenously in this illustrative simulator. P, S, Belief, triggers and practice follow supplied controls and any selected intervention. Multi-event overlap, feedback into P and S, ethical discontinuities and independent measurement are not implemented. B1/B2 do not numerically change A in this simulator until a future explicit, validated developmental link to cultivated P is defined.