SAE-1.5 · Variable atlas

Every component, without hiding its limitations

Theoretical variables are grouped by role: what the instantaneous equation calculates, how a trigger affects modeled obstruction, and what changes slowly over time. Ranges are conventions, not evidence of measurable spiritual units.

Not a human assessment. No definition here authorizes assigning numerical Purity, Awareness, spiritual worth or mental health status to a real person. B1/B2 and P do not have validated empirical scales.

Instantaneous state

C

1 (fixed)

Invariable universal Consciousness as a philosophical premise, not a physical measurement.

Limit: Cannot change through simulated action or health.

A(t)

[0,1]

Derived model output: C × (1 − K_effective).

Limit: A hypothetical index, not percent realization or observed human Awareness.

B1

[0,1]

Orientation toward truth, inquiry and openness to correction.

Limit: Candidate developmental contributor to cultivated Purity, not direct A multiplier.

B2

[0,1]

Voluntary informed trust and commitment to a chosen path.

Limit: Conceptual path through practice and choices; zero B2 no longer forces A=0.

K_base

[0,1]

Background conditioned obstruction, linked conceptually to Avidyā.

Limit: Latent, not measured directly and not forced to zero when there is no trigger.

K_effective

[0,1]

Current modeled combined obstruction after activated response.

Limit: Distinct from raw thought count, diagnosis and outward performance.

Event activation and coupling

L_i

[0,1]

Latent propensity for a specified obstruction manifestation.

Limit: Ego, attachment and aversion are correlated; not separate scores to sum blindly.

T_i

[0,1]

Activation of that trigger in the current modeled interval.

Limit: A trigger alone does not prove obstruction.

e_i=L_i×T_i

[0,1]

One-event activation input.

Limit: Multiple events require a further justified aggregation rule.

P_cultivated

[-1,1] proposed

Longer-term integrity and discernment inferred from decisions over time.

Limit: No validated spiritual scoring instrument exists.

P_effective

[-1,1] proposed

Present ability to express discernment in context.

Limit: May differ from cultivated P without erasing a person's history.

S_acquired

[0,1] illustrative

Learned domain capability such as musical mastery or practiced skill.

Limit: Can persist despite changing P; not Divine Śakti.

S_effective

[0,1] illustrative

Available capacity in the current situation.

Limit: Physical and mental conditions may affect availability without reducing worth.

q=P_effective×S_effective

[-1,1]

Signed candidate coupling affecting obstruction.

Limit: Sign is a modelling convention, not an observed ethical fact.

R

[0,1]

Event-related residual obstruction after hypothetical P–S interaction.

Limit: Not directly measured and not yet validated for multiple events.

η

[0,1]

Illustrative coupling strength.

Limit: Unknown; chosen for demonstration rather than fitted.

Long-run transformers and conditions

D

[0,1] illustrative

Practice or Sādhana, including voluntary value-aligned action.

Limit: D=0 means no current practice, not zero acquired P or S.

M

[0,1] illustrative

Environmental/Māyā pressure influencing rates and activation.

Limit: Epoch/Yuga values are traditional interpretations, not observed measurements.

u, v

nonnegative

Rates of reinforcing and clearing background obstruction.

Limit: u=αM+γDmax(-q,0); v=βDmax(q,0)+H, only a candidate.

H

nonnegative illustrative rate

Effective independent recovery-support contribution to clearing K_base, without requiring q>0.

Limit: Not simply the presence of treatment; not medical advice, not empirically calibrated.

α, β, γ

nonnegative

Unidentified response-rate parameters.

Limit: No causal rate is derived from scripture or human data.

Physical / mental context

unscored

Condition-specific influences on usable capabilities and reactions.

Limit: Illness and disability must not become spiritual penalties.

Grace, Dharma, Saṁskāra

philosophical

Interpretive concepts and potential boundary conditions.

Limit: Not secret numerical inputs or regression residuals.

Three distinct kinds of evidence

Philosophical interpretation: what traditional texts and lineages propose; metaphysical propositions are not measured here.

Structural verification: code checks of boundedness and internal model behavior using invented values.

Empirical observation: independently defined and consented measurements that could challenge an actual prediction. This validation has not been obtained.